> >> Yes but I do not work on >> - new first class instance variable >> - byecode loader >> - new package to speed up everything >> - scripting syntax >> > > Never mind, when I said "you", it was not specifically you, but anyone > else prefering to wait because of no free time. > >> so at the end I'm not sure what we lose but they are >> simple actions that other people can do too to distribute the load. >> So may be I will stop looking at squeak log. >> > > Sure, the danger is to become a follower of random activity driven by others. > If time is sparse, you might prefer to keep control. > But some changes like file buffering really makes a difference.
Yes but tracking changes you do not know is also taking time. I started but so far failed two times because you have to go slowly not to break too much the system. Tomorrow I will follow the advice of levente and check. The problem also is that the level of the tools is not really good. Some behavior of the history browser add to changeset other not. We will have to improve that. >> Stef >> >>> 2010/1/20 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >>>> ok I understand. I will keep your energy for the important one. >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1856 >>> >>>> but since I'm nearly the only that have a look at fixes in squeak >>>> may be I will simply just stop to look at them because the community >>>> does not seem to interested in getting them or producing them for pharo. >>>> >>> >>> Sure some people are interested as much as you are. >>> But waiting for someone to do the job for you, or wasting your own >>> time is rarely a dilemna except for the happy few owners of "own time" >>> ;) >>> >>> It's important to keep up with what's going on in other branches : >>> kind of technology forecasting :) >>> Just lurking the daily commit logs, and registering interesting stuff >>> as pharo issue is already valuable. >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: >>>> >>>>> Don't know if I'll have time, but changes are fairly easy to grab >>>>> (independent of each other). >>>> >>>> Ok >>>>> >>>>> Nicolas >>>>> >>>>> 2010/1/19 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >>>>>> Hi nicolas >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw that you commit some speed up for lineending to the squeaktrunk >>>>>> and I would love to have them >>>>>> since in moose we are computing a lot LOC :) >>>>>> By any chance could we get the same in pharo? >>>>>> Else I will harvest them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stef >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
