I wonder if we shouldn't somehow trigger a different tokenizer depending on what we check, instead of using some magic? We have all this information. For example class names, variables, selectors, ... and comments, strings, ... could use a different tokenizer that knows about the specifics?
Lukas 2010/1/21 Stan Shepherd <[email protected]>: > > Hi Lukas, did you get a chance to look at this? > > Refactoring-Spelling-Tests-StanShepherd.7.mcz in > http://www.squeaksource.com/RBBugFixes/ is the present version of the tests. > > They will still need the tweaks in your parser or normalizer to run green. > > ...Stan > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Spell-check-test-cases-tp4288633p4434232.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
