On Jan 24, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Michael Litchard wrote:
>>
>> There are SEVERAL reasons, but I don't have time to answer correctly. I will
>> let the board to answer, but I will to a summary:
>>
>> - Because of marketing
>> - Because to give visibility to outside
>> - People that are waiting to build stuff because they won't do it until have
>> a "stable release"
>> - Companies may not move on a propject that doesn't have yet a stable
>> release
>
>> - Having two branches requieres time and effort
> Am I understanding this correctly? Am I to believe that Pharo doesn't
> have both a development and production branch, or have I
> misunderstood?
It has... in 1.0, only bugfixes are integrated. There is a 1.1 (already 180
updates)
where all the other stuff is done.
You can download the last pre-built core image of 1.1 here:
http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/25338/PharoCore-1.1-11177-UNSTABLE.zip
The idea is to release 1.0 officially as soon as possible...
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
