That change reduces the problems, but it does not eliminate it because there 
are sill paths to IPv6-specific code that is "unprotected."  The primitive(s) 
in question fail if IPv6 is not available, in fact, the need to use IPv4 is 
detected by watching a primitive fail.  We then turn around later and call that 
same primitive w/o checking #useOldNetwork, hence the defect on non-IPv6 
machines. 

The code is very complicated and should be factored into separate classes to 
group the primitive with the protocols they serve.

Bill



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian 
Lienhard
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Bug in NetNameResolver on PharoCore 10508?

Between 10454 and 10508 I switched to useOldNetwork => true. Probably that 
makes the difference. Fixes are welcome!

Cheers,
Adrian

On Jan 27, 2010, at 15:10 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Probably.  We need to ensure that all of the IPv6 primitives are protected 
> with #useOldNetwork, and they are not at present.  I started to split 
> NetNameResolver into absract base and 4/6-specific subclasses, but was 
> distracted from it.  Something like that would help a lot.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Mariano Martinez Peck
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:00 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Bug in NetNameResolver on PharoCore 10508?
> 
> Yes, I can reproduce it in my Mac Os box...however, wasn't it the same 
> problem of the network that we already have ?
> NetNameResolver  useOldNetwork   etc ..  ?
> 
> 2010/1/27 Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> El mar, 26-01-2010 a las 17:14 -0600, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez
> escribió:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> yesterday, in some of that "why did I do that today" I decided to add 
>> a partition to my ext3 fs over LUKS encrypted over LVM over disk 
>> partitions Debian install. Well, things went far from ok, and the 
>> result I lost all the information (it is really encrypted, :(). I had 
>> a backup so nothing important was lost. Or that I thought. Because 
>> after reinstalling and trying to install the squeakvm I noticed that 
>> the squeak vm .deb file from:
>> 
>> http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-3.11.3.2135-linux_i386.deb
>> 
>> is not more available. I'm sure there are good reasons to remove that 
>> file. But for me that was the squeak vm that I was using (and the one 
>> you reach if you follow the links from pharo-download page and the 
>> one you'll try to download if you use a Debian derived distro...).
>> 
>> The case is that isn't available. So I got the tar.gz for i386 (there 
>> isn't amd64 package, but I have ia32-libs installed):
>> 
>> http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-3.11.3.2135-linux_i386.tar.gz
>> 
>> and by using this vm I have a problem that I hadn't before:
>> 
>> In a PharoCore 10508 image evaluate this:
>> 
>> NetNameResolver addressForName: 'www.yahoo.com<http://www.yahoo.com>'
>> 
>> I get:
>> 
>> Error: primitive has failed
>> 
>> in NetNameResolver class>>primGetNameInfo:flags
>> 
>> Also
>> 
>> NetNameResolver primGetNameInfoHostSize
>> 
>> gives the same error but in:
>> 
>> in NetNameResolver class>>primGetNameInfoHostSize.
>> 
>> First I though that was the change of vm but then, using the same vm 
>> I opened an old image:
>> 
>> Pharo1.0beta
>> Latest update: #10454
>> 
>> and there all works correctly.
>> 
>> Can someone confirm this bug so that I can add an issue in the traker.
>> 
>> Or maybe point to something that I am doing wrong.
>> 
>> I repeat, the data:
>> 
>> vm:     3.11.3-2135 #1 XShm Wed Sep 16 14:25:10 PDT 2009 gcc 4.3.3
>> image:  PharoCore 10508
>> result: failed
>> 
>> vm:     3.11.3-2135 #1 XShm Wed Sep 16 14:25:10 PDT 2009 gcc 4.3.3
>> image:  PharoCore 10454
>> result: worked
>> 
>> Thanks
> 
> Anybody can confirm? or is only me?
> 
> --
> Miguel Cobá
> http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected].
> inria.fr> 
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to