May be :) now let us focus on the obvious and ugly :) Stef
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Fernando olivero wrote: > Just a comment. > > Following a discussion i recall having with Juan Vuletich, the same idea > would apply for replacing Inheritance with composition for modeling > geometry in Morphic. > > Not having Morph -> RectangleMorph -> TextMorph , and pretty much all the > subclasses of BorderedMorph. > > > > On Jan 31, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Quizz >> >> What is the superclass of PopUpChoiceMorph ? >> >> >> >> the answer is below >> >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> V >> >> >> >> >> StringMorph.... probably because it has a String displayed. >> >> We removed it with luc and noury. But this is just an example of mix between >> inheritance >> and composition we would like to avoid in the future >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
