On 3 February 2010 10:33, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that this would be the first mail to smalltalk-research > Err, what you mean?
All i could say, that this scheme already discussed on squeak-dev couple of years ago... This is exactly the way where i think we should eventually go to. So what is new about it? > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Tom Van Cutsem <[email protected]> >> Date: February 3, 2010 5:13:00 AM GMT+01:00 >> To: SOFT members <[email protected]> >> Cc: Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> >> Subject: Communicating Event Loops >> >> Hi, >> >> For those interested in concurrency control: last week I gave a presentation >> about AmbientTalk's concurrency model at a meeting for Javascript industry >> developers. The presentation was recorded, and if you're interested you can >> see it here: >> http://ssjs.pbworks.com/Communicating-Event-Loops >> >> (towards the end there is an interesting discussion about the pros and cons >> of Erlang-style vs AmbientTalk-style concurrency) >> >> Cheers, >> Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
