> Cédrick:  I like the idea, however, I think your idea may be a
> "consequence" of my idea.


side note: This is not really my idea but an idea ;)  ideas are in the air
:))



> You can do all steps at the same time, but I rather go step by step. We
> first create the list, we create a group, we join people, we discuss, we
> learn, and after that, eventually it will naturally arrive a moment where we
> want to have our own real group.
>

yes I agree.
I just wanted to point out a simple wiki at first could be cool too. Just to
see a brief presentation of people...


>
> So...I will create the list right now :)
>

yes that's cool :) Let see how it goes...


>
> Mariano
>
> 2010/2/3 Cédrick Béler <[email protected]>
>
>> I'm ok for such a list...
>>
>> Nevertheless, I'm wondering if we could go a bit further by doing a kind
>> of research group with a proper web site listing all people involved and the
>> projects there're working on. We could then establish some categories and
>> eventually sub-groups. List all published papers, gives ressources to
>> people...
>>
>> We could also have a workshop every year (in ESUG or eventually
>> independantly). More importantly than discussions on papers, I think we need
>> to characterise people and their "expertise" area...
>>
>> For instance, I'm interested in some areas that are not really focussed in
>> Computer Science problematics (new compiler, traits, etc...).
>>
>> To me Smalltalk is the vehicle (a fun one) to experiment my research
>> stuffs. Here are some areas I'm working on:
>> -Case Based Reasoning - essentially similarity measure with uncertainty
>> -Constraint Satisfaction Programming (more interested in open models) and
>> especially the coupling between CBR and CSP
>> -NARS, a kind of General AI (logical stuff)
>> -Dynamic open models in general  -> Coevolution of model and their
>> instances (something I'd really like to dig into)
>> -Modeling Imperfect Information, ie. incomplete, uncertain, umprecise (->
>> so as to model expert information) - I would like to apply that to poker
>> game in the future :) - This is maybe the central aspect of my work
>>
>> Here is a quick list of what I do or plan to do... Having a central web
>> site would be excellent for visibility (of course a mailing can be setup
>> too), both for Smalltalk and for people doing research with it.
>>
>> What others think ?
>> Would you be ok for a central wiki where each person describe in one page
>> what their research is, what their future projects are, what they need
>> are... We could gather all confs calls that are potentially interesting...
>>  Of course this need some setup and reflexion to structure the group/website
>> but I think it worth it... And count me in if people like the idea.
>>
>> Cédrick
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>



-- 
Cédrick
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to