Hi!

Chris Muller wrote:
> Hi Göran, since this is at least the second time you've indicated
> having a performance issue with Magma, I'd like to reiterate my offer
> of assistance.

Thanks. :)

> I know it takes time to evaluate other persistence options, so I would
> be surprised if you've already started off in another direction merely
> because you thought nothing could be done.  Indeed, and you even
> indicated optimism that the slowness can probably be fixed.  Given my
> limited knowledge of Gjaller, it seems to me that Magma should be a
> perfect fit for it, especially in terms of performance and
> scalability.
> 
> My own curiousity is brimming, you are having a performance issue,
> there are many many opportunities for optimization, wouldn't you like
> to talk about it?

Sure, my problem is that I have a general lack of time. But I intend to 
try to take a serious look soon.

I presume that strategies in combination with running with external 
server might help "enough". Getting a session takes time, I have written 
a second "preallocated session queue" to remove that issue, and it seems 
to work ok.

It was a long time since I worked on this, so I don't have more details 
at hand right now. I need to start by rebasing on newest Magma.

regards, Göran


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to