On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:02 PM, James Foster wrote:
>> Why not, if it has been proved for a long time in Gemstone, shouldn't be
>> sensible to create something similar for Pharo? Or it uses some kind of
>> proprietary technology from Gemstone?
>
> You've heard the phrase, "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery"? It's
> true! We would be delighted to see Pharo use a similar scheme for namespaces.
> Not only is it is an elegant approach, but its adoption by Pharo would ease
> the upgrade path to GemStone should the opportunity arise.
>
> For an overview of GemStone namespaces, see
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z84n3O8YUsI. For more information see the
> Chapter 3 of the Programming Guide
> (http://seaside.gemstone.com/docs/GS64-ProgGuide-2.2.pdf).
>
thanks! We will definitly have a look. (We want to have a *real* good
abstractions for structuring large projects better...)
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
