On Feb 21, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:

> On Feb 21, 2010, at 11:59 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> 
>> Marcus this is strange we removed a lot of code and the image size grows :)
> 
>> We will have to investigate that.
> 
> 
> Did you run the cleanUpFor* methods? The grow may be due to MC cached 
> definitions. Or to the ScriptLoader log.
> 
MC cache is delete after each update. But the cleanup methods need to be run, 
yes... changesets hold on to old methods, making
changeset history quite expensive. 

I actually think the main problem is the Scriptloader... it gets big quite 
quickly (both in terms of generated code and the log).

> 
>> 
>> I would like also to play with mariano about the idea of use metacello to 
>> manage the unstable + external but pharo manage packages. To see how far we 
>> can unload packages now that settings, ....
> 
> Indeed, that would be cool. Extracting ImageSegment into an external package 
> also is on my todo list.

good!

--
Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to