On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 14:03 +0100, Levente Uzonyi wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Henrik Johansen wrote: > > > Well, ugly was a strong word. > > Reusing less, aka. shorter is a better choice, I guess. > > I think the difference is 3 lines for the 4 methods. > > > > > Cheers, > > Henry > > > > PS. In VisualWorks, the two perform equally. *Wishing for a Cog VM to > > test on* :) > > There's no inlining VM available ATM (besides SqueakJ, but that can't > run current images) and noone knows when one will be. And even though I > didn't try it, I expect that "inlining by hand" saves time and memory.
I'm working on inlining in Exupery at the moment though progress is still slow. (Time I've two young boys)... Bryce _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
