> Do you refer to the fact that we do not get this stupid pop-ups?
> there is preference for that I think. So we could set up by default.
> Did you see it?
>        http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1224
>
> Tell me if it helps you and sorry for the inconvenience incomplete progress is
> putting on you.

I don't know why this was changed? Probably point 1 is an unintended
side-effect of point 2?

I like the progress that Pharo 1.0 is doing. All in all it is a huge
progress every week. It is only this tiny detail that I find should be
undone :-)

>> Before going to Pharo 1.0 final, could we please undo the compiler
>> changes that handle the temporary variables?
>>
>> 1) In various code bases I see an increasing number of temp variables
>> that shadow instance variables.
>
> Yes this can be annoying we should find a solution in 1.1.
>        http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2102

I think this has to be changed as soon as possible, e.g. for Pharo 1.0
final. If somebody pointed me to where this was changed I could even
assemble a fix.

Point 2 could be a preference (or a lint rule). That doesn't hurry at
all and is fine for Pharo 1.1 (or later).

Lukas


-- 
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to