On Mar 13, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Gary Chambers wrote: > All "fun" on squeak-dev... > > Getting close to abandoning support for Polymorph in Squeak at all now... > Only a few apps based on 3.9 left here. Not sure they need any of the ongoing > improvements.
I'm not sure that maintaining two version is an option for you. > So, the question is, how would we want future additions/changes/fixes to > apply in Pharo. The way you were doing them is ok. You could also publish directly in Pharo But if you want to have you own package and control over it this is ok too. > Having Polymorph as an external (mergable, not loadable) package has worked > well for us, as much as it can be well. > > Perhaps changesets are the way to go from here... opinions/advice welcome... Why MC is not good for you? > > Regards, Gary > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
