Hi, No, I have to finish that. Is still in my todo list. I'll try to make some time today to look into that.
Cheers, Jorge On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it would be very good to have faster tests. In my experience, if tests > take too long to run, you don't use them. > > During the sprint in Lille, Jorge started to sort out long running tests from > the rest and make them subclass from SlowTestCase (or something similar). > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > On Mar 16, 2010, at 09:13 , Lukas Renggli wrote: > >> Btw, I am running the Pharo tests in my builds now too: >> >> >> http://hudson.lukas-renggli.ch/job/Pharo/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/(root)/ >> >> Click on duration twice to see the tests sorted by run-time. I feel a >> bit bad that the slowest test case is one that I wrote. I'll see if I >> can speed that up some more. >> >> Lukas >> >> On 15 March 2010 20:56, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi jorge >>> >>> did you publish the cleans for the tests you did during the sprint? >>> >>> Thanks Stef >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
