El mar, 16-03-2010 a las 13:16 -0500, Chris Muller escribió: > Hi Lukas, are there plans to include BTree standard in the Pharo > image? I was just wondering whether that was why the package is named > Collections-BTree, or if you would renaming it to simply BTree. > > It's mostly intangible that I have a dirty Collections package in many > image (because I often use BTree). Except that, I do find myself > sometimes checking in Monticello, "did I change something in > Collections? Oh, no, it's just BTree.. Or is it? Let me scroll this > list to be sure....." :) Kind of inconvenient, kind of inconsistent > for an external package. What do you think? >
-1 to add it to PharoCore. The aim is to reduce package and load them when necessary, as stand-alone package or as a dependency for another package. The reasons are the same to the integration of Lukas' generator code to squeak. It is a one more thing to watch for updates in maintaining the core image. If it is external and have a ConfigurationOfXXX then it can be loaded when needed. Maybe can be added if enough quorum, to the ConfigurationOfPharo package in order to be loaded in a development, end user oriented Pharo image. There we can have all the packages we want. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Packages Cheers > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
