>> Thanks. >> I will publish what I did and we can iterate from here. >> >> I have >> isUnix >> isRiscOS >> isMacOS >> isWin32 >> isWin32CE >> >> And I imagine that I will need >> isMacOS9 >> isMacOSX > > isMac > > isiPhone > "Answer true if running on iPhone" > > ^ (self platformName = 'iPhone') > > So one of two things can happen here > > (1) that you retain the isMacOS9 and isMacOSX to retain the existing usage > where we have an OS9 codebase and a OS-X subclassed codebase. > > (2) Or you drop OS9 completely and folded the OSX & OS9 into a > single class. > > Personally I think folding the classes together is a better choice since a > closure based image won't run on OS9. > > >>> What is the significance of version 1030? >> >> Yes this was my question? > > In that case the behavior of the operating system was different between 10.0 > and 10.3 versus 10.3 onwards. So > to make the tests past on 10.2 it had to be different from what happens when > you run 10.4
OK 1040 = 10.4 ahhhhh finally I got it sorry to be that slow to see the obvious. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
