On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected] > wrote:
> Thanks I will do that! > can you open a ticket because the list is starting to get long of the stuff > to integrate after martin's changes. > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2180 > BTW did you check if the other class besides ProtocolCatcher are working? > > No. No time yet. > Stef > > On Mar 20, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > This package should be removed from core but it should still be loadable. > Thus, when needed, they can be easily installed. On the other hand, it could > be in PharoDev image. > > > > - MetaObjectTools: This package is moved to PharoDev. It doesnt have any > users in PharoCore > > > > To fix, evaluate: > > > > (MCPackage named: 'ObjectMetaTools') unload. > > > > I created and put such code in > http://www.squeaksource.com/ObjectMetaTools > > > > To load it again in a Pharo image: > > > > Gofer new > > squeaksource: 'ObjectMetaTools'; > > package: 'ObjectMetaTools'; > > load. > > > > During the week I will analyze the CUIS' ProtocolCatcher and see if it > make sense to put it there too. > > > > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
