Cool since I like the idea. This is really where the ANSI standard shows that there were probably conflict of interest.
> FWIW, Gemstone returns the arg.. > > Dale > ----- "stephane ducasse" <[email protected]> wrote: > > | hi guys > | > | I saw that nicolas fixed all the add: ... in squeak to return the > | argument and I like the idea I created an issue. > | Now I saw that nicolas fixed also nextPut: > | > | Item was changed: > | ----- Method: DummyStream>>nextPut: (in category 'accessing') ----- > | nextPut: aByte > | + "do nothing" > | + ^aByte! > | - "do nothing"! > | > | I checked the ANSI standard and this is unspecified. So I was > | wondering what the others dialects are doing? > | What do we do? > | > | Stef > | _______________________________________________ > | Pharo-project mailing list > | [email protected] > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
