On Mar 21, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> -> this of course means that #subclasses would just return those that
> by chance are
> in memory... I don't understand how that can work. Honestly :-)
>
of course, they realized that, too. Thus: #subclasses never checked for
#isInMemory.
But there where strangely names methods to iterate over all subclasses in
memory (called #allSubclassesDoGently:).
But Smalltalk>>#classNames foes check for #isInmemory. Which means you could
have a case where a subclass would not be
in Smalltalk classNames...
This is all fundamentally broken, sorry.
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
