OK, I've tried the Smalltalk one... With rev 2151 gnuification (awk) is done as I have gnu-interp.c and gnu-interp.c.log in my build directory.
Benchmark gives me: Squeak VM 3.11.3 -r 2151 + FT2Plugin + Gnuification ========================================== 312385600 bytecodes/sec; 7320778 sends/sec 310868245 bytecodes/sec; 8271046 sends/sec 310679611 bytecodes/sec; 8271046 sends/sec 310868245 bytecodes/sec; 7232576 sends/sec 310491206 bytecodes/sec; 8271046 sends/sec compared to Squeak VM 3.11.3 -r 2135 + FT2Plugin ========================================== 334421946 bytecodes/sec; 8026581 sends/sec 334640522 bytecodes/sec; 7449884 sends/sec 334421946 bytecodes/sec; 7449884 sends/sec 334421946 bytecodes/sec; 7675486 sends/sec 327156549 bytecodes/sec; 7598782 sends/sec so it seems that on my machine rev 2135 without gnuification is a little better. I have GCC 4.4.3, Linux 32bits. Laurent Laffont On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Levente Uzonyi <le...@elte.hu> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, laurent laffont wrote: > > I've tried gnuification on rev 2151. cmake/configure OK. But while >> building: >> >> >> /home/lol/sandbox/squeakvm/Squeak-3.11.3.2151-pharo-src/build/gnu-interp.c:25104:2: >> erreur: #error GNUIFICATION FAILED ( 0 ) >> > > Which gnuification method did you try? > There are two different versions. The origial version is an awk script > which is run when you're building the vm with make. This is executed by > default if you have awk installed. > There's another version written in smalltalk (linked by Mariano into this > thread) which is not used by VMMAker at the moment, you probably don't need > that. If you applied the latter one, you have to make sure that the first > one is not executed. You can't gnuifying the sources twice. > Since both do the same, the best you can do now is to ignore the smalltalk > version. If VMMaker will adopt Gnuifier.st we can remove the awk dependency > from the build process, until then you shouldn't apply it if your platform > has awk installed. > > > Levente > > > >> >> Laurent Laffont >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 6:47 PM, laurent laffont >> <laurent.laff...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Does it mean latest SVN source is already "Gnuified" ? With latest rev. >>>> I >>>> >>>>> have a little drop in benchmarks. However I'd rather put a stable >>>>> >>>> release >>>> >>>>> for Pharo 1.0 than latest trunk. What do you think ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> The so-called "gnuification" is a transformation of the interp.c file. >>>> So >>>> this is done after generating the sources with VMMaker. The cmake >>>> configuration that comes with revision 2135 does not have this step >>>> enabled, >>>> and the more recent version that I used, revision 2151, has it. The >>>> magic is >>>> in the awk script in unix/cmake/gnuify.awk which produes gnu-interp.c. >>>> >>>> >>> OK thanks. I will take a look. >>> >>> Laurent Laffont >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> >>>>> Laurent Laffont >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Adrian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
