On Mar 29, 2010, at 09:22 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> - I assume Mariano is going to build a Pharo RC4 when we have a new >> PharoCore RC4 (there have been some updated packages like Metacello and OB >> if I understood correctly). >> >> >> > PharoCore RC4 or PharoDev RC4 ??? because Metacello and OB are for > Dev...not core :) > Or there will be a PharoCore RC4 ?
Yes, since we have to do something to fix the situation with the tests we'll have to do an update, which will be declared PharoCore RC4. Adrian > > > >> [...] >> >>> I think that theses tests do not show bugs but probably badly designed >> tests. >>> So why don't you move them to expected failures and we release 1.0? >> >> Then there would be a failure when these tests don't fail, which happens >> every second run. So we would need to remove them. But if somebody has some >> cycles to figure out why they fail we could probably fix them. >> >> Adrian >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
