On Mar 29, 2010, at 11:16 30AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > I presume that under the idiom "latin1" you refer to code page 1252 > rather than iso8859-L1, right ? > > Nicolas Good question :) What IS the presumed internal encoding of Bytestrings in Squeak? That's the one I meant, I merely assumed it was latin1 seeing as how the text converter refers to it as such. Personally I thought it was iso8859-L1, seeing as the bytestring to unicode conversion does a simple shift of chars > 127 to the 0080 - 00FF range.
Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
