On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Germán Arduino <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, correct me if I'm wrong, but Pharo don't have its own Win VM right? > > Then if Pharo relies on the Squeak Windows VM I think that a good > policy is use the latest. > > No, I don't think so. I don't know who did it, but at the end it is a squeak VM. I mean, the sources come from svn or vmmaker or both, but there is no fork (maybe i am wrong). Ok, we changed the splash picture and the name. Does someone know? > Just my opinion. > > Cheers. > Germán. > > > > > 2010/3/28 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>: > > Hi. I have just tested the Windows VM availables and tested the 1 > > tinyBenchmarks and running all tests of PharoDev RC3. > > > > I tested with this Windows VMs: > > > > 1) The one that it is in pharo website (PharoVM-Win32-3.11.8): > > 2) The other one from pharo website (exupery-vm-0.15-win32): > > 3) THe new one that Andreas released today (SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin) > > > > > > 1) vm\SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin\ > > > > has freetype > > > > 1 tinyBenchmarks > > '404104183 bytecodes/sec; 11914092 sends/sec' > > '363120567 bytecodes/sec; 10946039 sends/sec' > > '390839694 bytecodes/sec; 12597221 sends/sec' > > '346179851 bytecodes/sec; 9996295 sends/sec' > > > > 1 gofer test fails > > > > > > 2) exupery-vm-0.15-win32 > > > > doesnt have freetype. Unacceptable for Pharo. > > > > 1 tinyBenchmarks > > '365714285 bytecodes/sec; 9935342 sends/sec' > > '365975696 bytecodes/sec; 10435290 sends/sec' > > '349011588 bytecodes/sec; 16777208 sends/sec' > > '339973439 bytecodes/sec; 11292844 sends/sec' > > > > Two RB test with errors > > > > > > 3) SqueakVM-Win32-4.0.1-bin > > > > has freetype > > > > 1 tinyBenchmarks > > '353835521 bytecodes/sec; 11294326 sends/sec' > > '415922014 bytecodes/sec; 12319712 sends/sec' > > '369675090 bytecodes/sec; 11149338 sends/sec' > > '373177842 bytecodes/sec; 9858402 sends/sec' > > > > all tests geen > > > > > > We suggestion is to remove the Exupery Vm from the pharo website. > > The new version 4.1 doesn't seem to be improvements in speed and from > what I > > read about Andreas comment, it only fixes problems for SqueakMap, which > was > > removed in Pharo, and a change in the close event of the windows. > > I would only let for download the PharoVM-Win32-3.11.8 > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Mariano > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
