On 4/3/2010 1:09 PM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
This sounds really inefficient. Did you remove the primitive send from
ByteString >> #at:put:, or the following works, breaking the above
constraint?
(ByteString basicNew: 1) at: 1 put: (Character value: 128)
Apologies, it's actually 256 of course. Confused it with ASCII/Latin1
compatibility.
(ByteString basicNew: 1) at: 1 put: (Character value: 256); yourself
will return a WideString.
Michael
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
