Hi, I am student who work on the project. I was afforded a thesis which has roughly the same project. They had the idea to redo the hierarchy of collections. So why not do not do it? I am not an expert but, perhaps we can simplify it? This is the thesis in spanish: http://n4.nabble.com/file/n1750153/Reingenier-a_de_Jerarqu-as_Polim-rficas_Utilizando_Traits_-_Tesis_de_Licenciatura_-_Acciaresi_Cla.pdf Reingenier-a_de_Jerarqu-as_Polim-rficas_Utilizando_Traits_-_Tesis_de_Licenciatura_-_Acciaresi_Cla.pdf . (you can find the presentation of the new hierarchy at page 3)
If you agree with the reimplementation of the hierarchy of collections you can propose ideas! :) Tristan Bourgois -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Collection-tp1590427p1750153.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
