Usually I put the 1.1 tag on items I integrated in 1.0 and I didn't close the issues so they are not lost. The only one I remember that we may also want to integrate is the network rollback. Not sure what the plan is there. But it doesn't seem anybody is working on a better implementation so I suggest we also roll back in 1.1.
Adrian On Apr 7, 2010, at 14:20 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Adrian >> >> Once 1.0 is released we should check that all the fixes that went in 1.0 >> after the fork to 1.1 are integrated in 1.1. >> > > The problem is how we can identify them ? > I only remember > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1841 > but it even is different in 1.1 > > Ahh maybe also the NetNameResolver problem ? > > >> Would be nice also to remove the testsexpected to break so that we give >> them a chance to be fixed in 1.1. >> >> > Good idea. > > >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
