Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > I would be more detailed. Why don't you say the menu labels instead of > move > xxx ? > >> What is the advantage of this way? > > I have no idea. What I do am aware of is that we want clean and short > menus > for Pharo. Having looong list menus is unconfortable to work with. How > frequently do you use that option ? how many people use that ? >
I put the user movements to emphasize the greater amount and variety of effort required (not thinking of readers reproducing the steps :( ). System -> Preferences... -> Full screen on My point, which you clarified for me, is more that the way submenus appear in Squeak seems to flow better i.e. when you want to open a submenu, you click on it and it replaces the outer menu in the same place vertically so you can just continue to move down, as opposed to hovering, moving to the right (which breaks the 'moving down' flow, and navigating the submenu. Maybe they could coexist, since clicking on a menu item with a submenu doesn't seem to do anything useful now? -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Menu-navigation-tp1754368p1754402.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
