Hi Bill, I don't really understand what you're doing, too many mails in my inbox, I'm lost :) What simple test / code can I run to reproduce your problem and try to help you ? It seems interesting.
Cheers, Laurent Laffont On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]>wrote: > I think there is something wrong with the library searches in 3.11-3. It > is one thing for my hacked together .so to avoid detection due to some > mistake on my part, but has anyone tried ODBC on Linux with the new vm? > It's sitting in /usr/lib like it has always been; the vm should find it, > right? > > Bill > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Schwab,Wilhelm K > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 10:57 AM > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list; > [email protected] > Subject: [Pharo-project] Linux 3.11-3 vm and shared libraries > > Hello all, > > I am trying to use the 3.11-3 vm to see if it fixes my double return value > problem, and I cannot get it to load the library to do the test =:0 At this > point, I am just guessing. Can someone who has been successful at it give > me an example? What is the .so file named, how do you refer to it in > #moduleName, where do you put the file relative to the vm? > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
