I'm totally noob on FFI. Maybe the vm-dev mailing list is more appropriate ? It seems there's actually some problems with it http://n4.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?tpl=search-page&node=104410&query=ffi
On my machine, 20/21 FFI unit tests fails... I haven't been able to build last revision of squeak-vm trunk. Laurent Laffont On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]>wrote: > Laurent, all, > > If I may jump to conclusions a little, the 3.11-3 vm's changes break the > loading of libraries, certainly to the point of being arkane. Beyond that, > LinuxODBC is transparent to it, so I am left wondering how it is suppose to > work at all?? > > The RC3 one-click image and vm produce very nice fonts on my Ubuntu laptop, > but it retains the FFI/double defect, and from the naming of the plugins, > must be based on a pre 3.11-3 vm. > > Is the plan to use 3.11-3 for the one-click? If so, we need to do > something about external libraries; at a minimum, LinuxODBC should work, > whether by fully understanding how to use environment variables, or (as I > suspect) getting the dlopen() call to work again. > > Another option is to identify the FPU related fixes and apply them to the > current one-click vm. > > Any preferences? Any success with 3.11-3 and LinuxODBC? I'd be happy to > be wrong about this. > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
