IIUC it doesn't matter because one of the other prohibitions of the section 3.3.1 is the use of 'foreign runtimes' so any interpreted language that they've not listed is out...
Em 15/04/2010 17:11, Stéphane Ducasse < [email protected] > escreveu: Thanks for the info. But let us see because we do not know if a squeak-vm is an C or smalltalk app. Stef > Not to defend Apple's hubris or anything, but John's other apps written in > Squeak are still in the store. Scratch was not taken down because it is > implemented in Squeak, but because it downloads code from the internet and > runs it. > > - Bert - > > On 15.04.2010, at 21:20, stephane ducasse wrote: > >> >> Yes extremely sad. >> I imagine that you saw my mail on esug-list. >> >> >> On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Juan Vuletich wrote: >> >>> Andreas Raab wrote: >>>> On 4/8/2010 2:43 PM, Sean Malloy wrote: >>>>> Anyone have any thoughts on this change to the agreement? >>>> >>>> Just in case anyone had any illusions on this: >>>> >>>> http://computinged.wordpress.com/2010/04/15/apple-removes-scratch-from-ipadiphoneitouch/ >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> - Andreas >>> >>> Oh! How silly then can be! >>> >>> :( >>> Juan Vuletich >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
