The question is what we call core. I think that core should contain less and less but pharo should contain infrastructure and FFI or Alien are infrastructure.
If you look at my answer to German on "Re: [Pharo-project] Really Important message (tm)" April 16 You can see that with a fast loading package mechanism then we could really introduce in "Pharo-Core" (= what we have now) infrastructure package to produce Pharo and works on making a real core. FFI does not belong to this core=mini but to Pharo from my point of view Mini Mini + FFI + Tools + IDE + Compiler ....= PharoCore Pharo + Sounds + Morphic examples + archiview.... = Pharo Note that the belonging of one package to group is not automatically clear. This is why metacello is key and a metacelloRepository. Steg >> I wouldn't include neither FFI or Alien FFI in neither PharoCore or PharoDev >> image. > > +1 > >> That's only my opinion. > > Maybe Stef should tell us more about why he thinks it should be included. > > Bye > T. > > -- > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
