Dear List,
I spend quite some time in tracking down a bug in Mondrian. I found
it. The source of it stems from the following behavior in Pharo:
-=-=-=-=-=-=
(0...@0 corner: 1...@10) containsPoint: 5...@5. => true
(1...@10 corner: 0...@0) containsPoint: 5...@5. => false
-=-=-=-=-=-=
I find the latter a bit surprising. VW returns false as well. I would
expect the second expression to return true.
There is also "(1...@0 corner: 0...@10) containsPoint: 5...@5. => false"
I looked in the Pharo mailing list archive, and apparently this hasn't
been discussed yet.
The class Rectangle is central. Modifying it (either by making "(1...@10
corner: 0...@0) containsPoint: 5...@5" returns true or not permitting a
rectangle "(1...@10 corner: 0...@0)" to be valid) may have some serious
impact.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
