I commented on the website of google.

Alexandre


On 24 Apr 2010, at 13:59, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2352

I proposed a fix and would loved to have feedback.

Stef

On Apr 24, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

the problem seems to be due to
        (Duration seconds: 73994 nanoSeconds: 321000000) seconds
        which returns a fraction


In pharo

Duration>>seconds
        "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."

        ^ (seconds rem: SecondsInMinute) + (nanos / NanosInSecond)


In Squeak>>seconds
        "Answer the number of seconds the receiver represents."

        ^seconds rem: SecondsInMinute


Now I have the impression that the squeak version is right

What do you think?

Stef


On Apr 24, 2010, at 4:38 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:

Hi guys

I have to fix my house :) so I could not continue to kill this one on Unstable 11321

'-1199-01-05T20:33:14.321-05:00' asDateAndTime printString
        ->  '-1199-01-05T20:33:(14321/1000).321-05:00'

STef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.






_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to