ok may be we should rollback
We should also include the network changes made in 1.0 to roll back IVP6


> WeakKeyDictionary, to be specific.
> To be frank, to me the new implementation in 1.1 seems simply broken.
> 
> Cheers,
> Henry
> 
> Den 24. apr. 2010 kl. 22.58 skrev "Schwab,Wilhelm K" <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Stef,
>> 
>> What do you mean by "weak structures?"  Weak collections?
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane 
>> Ducasse
>> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:58 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] starting to think about 1.1 freeze
>> 
>> ok but this is still good to know what we could wrap up.
>> Now I'm fixing some tests if somebody wants to help there are some problems 
>> on weak structures.
>> 
>> Stef
>> On Apr 24, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Stef,
>>>> 
>>>> I will soon reach a point of missing a way to do callbacks.  Alien/FFI is 
>>>> listed among the goals, and I would very much like to see that happen, 
>>>> especially if callbacks are well supported as a result.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> But what we should *not* do is to delay the release for that. Releases
>>> should be a snapshot of what is already done. 1.1 *as it is now* (minus 
>>> bugs) is already a huge step forward. If we delay that to make it even 
>>> better, we will again delay the release for a looong time.
>>> 
>>> I vote for just defininf 1.1 as what 1.1 is *now* and stabilize it. There 
>>> will be a 1.2 anyway.
>>> 
>>>   Marcus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord
>>> Europe. Team RMoD.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to