BTW, Lukas had pointed out that my implementation is incomplete. So before integrating we should make sure the implementation covers all cases.
Adrian Begin forwarded message: > From: "Lukas Renggli" <[email protected]> > Date: October 21, 2008 6:28:32 PM GMT+02:00 > To: "Pharo Development" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Size of objects > Reply-To: Pharo Development <[email protected]> > >> BTW, I think that would be a meaningful addition. Could somebody quickly >> check the method to verify that I didn't do any miscalculation? > > The only problem I see is that variable objects might also have > inst-vars. So you need to count the > > self class instSize * Smalltalk wordSize > > part in any case. > > Lukas On Apr 27, 2010, at 12:45 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: > I once sent some code to the mailing list (search for thread named "Size of > objects"). We should add this to the image. I think I named it #sizeInMemory. > > Adrian > > On Apr 27, 2010, at 12:03 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> Hi. I don't know if "memory occupation" is the better name. I just want to >> know the amount of memory that an object is occupying in RAM. I mean, the >> amount of bytes. >> >> Is this possible ? if true, how ? I would like to do it from both sides: >> image and VM. >> >> I checked both but I didn't find anything. >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Mariano >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
