Excellent!
We should decide if we want to maintain it or not.
Then we can create a package for it. 

Stef

On May 7, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Hilaire Fernandes wrote:

> I have uploaded a new version of the gettext package. I have removed a few 
> classes used for the itnernal translator. So now, only gettext based catalog 
> messages is used.
> 
> Philipp, I have added a String>>translateTo: aLocale you can used from 
> Seaside application.
> 
> If we agree on that protocole, we can have in Pharo-Cire two String messages 
> defined as follow:
> 
> String>>translated
> "answer the receiver translated to the default language"
> ^ NaturalLanguageTranslator translate: self
> 
> String>>translatedTo: localeID
> "answer the receiver translated to the given locale id"
> ^ NaturalLanguageTranslator translate: self toLocale: localeID
> 
> 
> Then a dummy class NaturalLanguageTranslator withn two class messages:
> 
> NaturalLanguageTranslator class>>translate: aString
> ^ aString
> 
> NaturalLanguageTranslator class>>translate: aString toLocale: localeID
> ^ aString
> 
> 
> NaturalLanguageTranslator class is redefined in the Gettext package.
> 
> It should be possible to simplify the whole protocole after removing the 
> LanguageEditor. This one is totaly unused, and it does not make sense to me 
> to use Smalltalk to translated string, there are better third party tool to 
> do that. Can I remove the LanguageEditor?
> 
> Hilaire
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to