On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]
> wrote:

> not for 1.1 guy. it worked so far.... so let us finish 1.1
>
>
>
Ok, I agree. I never said to include it in 1.1. I want just to discuss about
it.




>
> On May 10, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
> > Hi folks. I've just discovered that PackageInfo >> classes  return a
> collection of classes AND traits. This is incorrect. Solutions are:
> >
> > 1) Rename #classes to #classesAndTraits
> > 2) Modify #classes so that it ONLY answer classes
> >
> > I would like to fix it but I am not sure the consequences of such change.
> Maybe Monticello doesn't take into account Traits anymore hahha
> >
> > Thanks for any help you can give.
> >
> > Mariano
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to