On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> >> I think you're right. I will add this description. >> >> Indeed, with easy_squeakvm script you have reproducibility (all is >> automated, explicit svn rev. and ConfigurationOfVMMaker). >> >> > Yes, it is reproduceable. But it is the same, in the Conf version, I need > the version of easy_squeakvm script as you will commit after. > ? 1 version of easy_squeakvm uses automatically the right squeakvm revision and the right version of ConfigurationOfVMMaker. So the reference is not ConfigurationOfVMMaker nor squeakvm sources, but easy_squeakvm itself. > > easy_squeakvm is linux specific...so I would put the svn version, not > easy_squeakvm script ;) > Yes it's true. But I think it's easily portable to MacOSX as it's a Unix system. As there's some work on the Windows VM build to use CMake if I understand, with cygwin we can have it too. And then we can automatically generate the One-Click archive from scratch ;p I can tag easy_squeakvm 1.0 for Pharo 1.0, easy_squeakvm 1.1 for Pharo 1.1 and so on. Laurent Laffont. > > >> May be we can "translate" easy_squeakvm to Smalltalk so we can have an >> EasySqueakVM package (or better name) which is cross platform. >> > > hahahah maybe ;) > > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Laurent Laffont >> >> http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/ >> http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Mariano >>> >>> >>> >>>> Laurent Laffont >>>> >>>> http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/ >>>> http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
