On 14 May 2010 04:27, David T. Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:33:38AM +0300, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> 2010/5/14 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:26 PM, St??phane Ducasse >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> mariano >> >> >> >> i just released a fix could you stress the system? >> > >> > wiiiiiii >> > >> > My .changes is now 36MB. It seems to work ok. >> > >> Don't climb too high , failing would be painfull :) > > Actually you should keep climbing! The address mapping needs to > do strange things on the 32MB boundaries for backward compatibility > with the original 32MB address mapping. So keep loading those > Seaside packages until you get to at least 150MB or so, just be > to sure it keeps working over 32MB -> 64MB -> 96MB -> 128MB ... >
Isn't it would be wiser to do a simple numerical tests, instead of manually tossing bunch of code into the .changes? > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
