ok ok, I surrender :)
On 2010-05-15 07:22:51 -0300, Michael Roberts
<[email protected]> said:
You might disagree but it's what we decided. We should keep different
version tags so that we can use different update streams (sections
within) in the future.
Cheers mike
On Friday, May 14, 2010, Stéphane Ducasse
<[email protected]> wro
te:
I do not have strong feeling about that ;)
Just busy :)
On May 14, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
May I disagree with that? I mean "pharo" is "pharo core", and "pharo dev
" is just pharo+packages loaded, so I don't see the point on declaring it a
different version.
On 2010-05-14 09:04:31 -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]
om> said:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Esteban Lorenzano
<[email protected]
wrote:
Hi,
Why SystemVersion current version answers 'PharoCore1.0' and not just
'Pharo1.0'?
Maybe to distinguish from PharoDev?
PharoCore answers -> 'PharoCore1.0'
PharoDev (a.k.a Pharo) answers -> 'Pharo-1.0'
Cheers,
Esteban
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
