Stef,

#2476 is a first attempt at a report.  At least it captures the defect and the 
change set, such as it is.  I did not discover the tests' dependence on my 
stream changes until I tried it in 1.1 beta, and then I remembered that the 
changes are important to it; among them is #nextMany:, which is intended to not 
truncate and to raise an error on exhaustion.  Perhaps someone can think of a 
way to rewrite the test so that it will work with the methods in the image??

My ideas on streams are documented on the wiki; there are two overlapping 
entries, one of which contains some interesting thoughts by Nicolas, and the 
other some more detail on my alternate selector idea.

Bill 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane 
Ducasse
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] ConnectionQueue defect in 1.0

bill can you open a new bug entry.
There are too much activities so that we could remember all the information 
passing around :)

Stef

On May 25, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> Please see attached - CAREFULLY :)  It turns out that NetworkSmokeTest will 
> fail in your images, for want of #nextMany: and other additions I have made 
> to streams.  I will try to get them packaged for release, but if nothing 
> else, please take a careful look at ConnectionQueue, which appears to be 
> broken in 1.x, and hopefully fixed by the attached.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Schwab,Wilhelm K [[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 6:33 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Pharo-project] ConnectionQueue defect in 1.0
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Attached is a simple test for networking.  It passed in 1.0 RC1 and fails in 
> 1.0 and in 1.1 beta.  The problem arises in ConnectionQueue>>listenLoop.  
> #waitForConnectionFor: returns a boolean, not the new socket, and the listen 
> loop looks like it is expecting the socket.  Any ideas?
> 
> Billx
> 
> <SocketWoes.1.cs>_______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to