Ohhh, my mistake, I will change it as deprecated. Thank you for the report.
On May 25, 2010, at 23:51 , nullPointer wrote: > > that methods is marked like "deprecated": 'Use self deprecated: 'Use and: > instead'. ' > > But curiosly the method #and:and:and:and: appears normal, without > deprecation. That behavior is correct? > > Thanks > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/and-and-and-deprecated-on-1-1-why-tp2230786p2230786.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project --- Jannik Laval _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
