But then which is the equivalence to #and:and:and: when I have many conditions?
Perhaps I will say a stupidity... but , not is valid the implementation of #&& and #|| messages instead of #and:... #or: .....? ( aCondition1 && aCondition2 && aCondition3 ) ifTrue: [ <something> ] Regards -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/and-and-and-deprecated-on-1-1-why-tp2230786p2231486.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
