On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <
[email protected]> wrote:
> but I was comparing with squeak :)
>
> I'm on 2.53 intel core 2 duo so may be the difference is that.
>
Indeed that's one difference. Only the ratios matter. Different machines
have different performance at different times of the day. e.g. run another
performance-intensive program while you're collecting results and you've
just collected some useless results.
>
> Squeak 4.1.1beta2: #(1357 2129 1457)
> Cog: #(141 844 568)
>
> (2.66 GHz Intel Core i7)
>
>
> On May 26, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
>
> > Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> >> any idea why on pharo 1.1
> >> | b n |
> >> b := [:aa :ab| ].
> >> n := 10000000.
> >> { Time millisecondsToRun: [1 to: n do: [:i| b value: 0 value: 0]].
> >> Time millisecondsToRun: [1 to: n do: [:i| b valueWithArguments: {0.
> 0}]].
> >> Time millisecondsToRun: [1 to: n do: [:i| b valueWithArguments: #(0
> 0)]] } #(1597 2606 1696)
> >
> > Presumably the Array constructor {...} is more costly than a literal
> Array, which makese sense.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
