On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Reading the complete thread is quite interesting.


Yes definitely. They do not all wrong. It is not necessary to
duplicate the external code.
If i read correctly, there is some security issues with the current
Squeak/Pharo VM.


> Stef
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Bert Freudenberg <b...@freudenbergs.de>
>> Date: May 27, 2010 7:37:54 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: Squeak Virtual Machine Development Discussion 
>> <vm-...@lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>> Subject: [Vm-dev] Squeak removed from Gentoo Linux
>> Reply-To: Squeak Virtual Machine Development Discussion 
>> <vm-...@lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>>
>>
>> Squeak was recently removed from Gentoo Linux Ebuilds because of security 
>> issues in our bundled plugins:
>>
>>       http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247363
>>
>> While it is convenient for us to bundle external library sources, package 
>> maintainers do not like that practice. Is there anything we can 
>> realistically do about it?
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>



-- 
Serge Stinckwich
UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://doesnotunderstand.org/

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to