On 2 June 2010 16:59, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >> Some news (sources at www.squeaksource.com/Athens): >> >> About having a first 'minimal' version, working with RomePluginCanvas and >> RomeReferenceCanvas, it seems to be ok. >> I retrieve the tests from Sophie and all are green. >> In romeDemo, I made a category with some working examples (using >> RomePluginCanvas and RomeRefrenceCanvas). >> >> However, There is still some primitive faillures for which I'm not able to >> do a lot of things: see for example RomeDemo class >> demoRotateWindow. > > >> >> Now about fonts, I thing the best is to rebuild all: a part of the code is >> using some Tweak specific classes, or other classes no longer present in >> Pharo. >> Morover I wonder why it is usefull to have a Rome-comon API for fonts >> (RomeFont), when pharo as already its own AbstractFont API ? > > I guess that the idea was really to have an API > >> fonts are just set to a canvas to draw strings. You can see an example using >> fonts in RomeDemo class >> demoRotateSophieLogo. >> >> From tweak, I only kept classes about CTransformCanvas, but I don't know >> what it is :) There is just a working example in RomeDemo. So maybe it >> could be removed (I think all the 'Athens-Tweak' category could be removed). >> >> So maybe at this point we could start to fix the API (?) > > Excellent! > So may be we could put ROME in pharo-dev as a demo? > But without bindings with Morphic, its not really userful.
> Stef > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
