Of course it is possible, and at times it would even be the correct thing to do. The point is that we are currently limited to it, and that is always a sign that work remains to be done.
________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Durr [[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 12:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] pharo and stand along GUI projects Since single-fullwindow apps like garageband, finalcut, aperture et al. are all very well accepted, a single-fullwindow app based on pharo sounds possible. On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Douglas Brebner <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/06/2010 14:39, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: >> >> Native widgets are over-rated IMHO. That is not to say they have no >> value, and it would be nice to see us make them easy to use. I am split on >> whether I would like to see the IDE tools appear as host widgets on Linux; >> it would probably be best to set (sorry) a preference for the image to run >> over multiple windows or to default to what we have now which can be very >> useful if I need to work on two or more images at one time. That is rare, >> and most of the time I would like to see the OS' task bar include my >> Smalltalk tools. >> >> > > The only real advantage I see for native widgets currently is that they > support things like accessibility, though Juan mentioned he's thought about > that for Morphic 3 which gives me hope :) > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
