> I started reading about Moose (esp Meta-environment and executable > meta-language using smalltalk) and it was all about languages with > introspection. SAS has no such ability, and is not even object > oriented. So it didn't seem like a good fit. Have I misunderstood--for > example, are the remarks directed more at smalltalk as an implementation > language for Moose?
As soon as you provide a parser and a meta-model for your language, then moose is your friend. Independently if your language is object-oriented or not. I build an importer for C for Moose. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
