Lukas Renggli wrote: > > The problem is that SourceTalk is quite heavily targeted at Monticello 2. > For example, projects directly map to Monticello 2 projects. Also I > suspect that it would also require some additional tweaks to really make > it scale better than SqueakSource in the next 10 years. > > I am still waiting for Monticello 2 to finally come out. It would be so > much a step forward. And we would get rid of the legacy SqueakSource code. >
Sounds like a strategic decision maybe required? When is MC2 scheduled (or expected) to come out? Maybe a Pharo MC2 sprint could speed things up? ps. I have to say, I probably just really like the name SourceTalk ... it's a neutral name for GemStone, Pharo, Squeak ... and could even have a domain like "st.world.st" :) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/squeaksource-is-down-again-tp2266603p2268445.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
