On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < [email protected]> wrote:
> Yes I will! > > Stef > > > We are reaching 2.2 MB with shrinking based on this classes structure. > > Stay tuned :-) > > I like when I hear that. This will start to be really sexy. > And it would be incredible much more sexy if we can load the network package (and maybe monticello). Having a PharoKernel of 2.2 where I can then load network/monticello is a dream. Then I can deploy a Pharo production seaside image of a couple of MB Hilarie do you know how far we are from that dream? > > > I will create the next patches for methods > > reorganization. > > > > Please don't forget the second part of this fix: > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2069 > > > > Many thanks! > > -- Pavel > > > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 12024 > >> ----- > >> > >> - Issue 2105: Packages remodularization > >> > >> and now without obsolete classes > >> > >> Stef (thanks Pavel) > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
